Skip to content
Midterm WatchRaces · forecasts · voting guides

Standards desk

Evidence before certainty.

Facts, polls, attributed forecasts and Midterm Watch editorial comparisons are distinct content types. A forecast’s exact future result cannot be verified before the election. Comparing two forecasters tests agreement and exposes uncertainty; it does not certify a winner.

Calendar facts and candidate identities use at least two source documents in the published scope. Official current election instructions resolve stale generic calendars. A mirror and its original publisher are not independent forecasters. Poll methods are taken from the original pollster; repeated reporting of one survey does not create another independent survey.

House outlook: compare DDHQ October 20 with Cook October 16. Use the less confident category if both favor the same party. If either is a toss-up or they favor different parties, use Toss-up. Senate and governor comparisons use the explicitly dated UVA assessment. Executive comparisons use the dated Jacobson assessment and Horizon’s October 20 category; no Horizon numerical odds are adopted.

Legislative categories remain attributed to Louis Jacobson. Judicial and ballot-measure forecasts remain unassigned where evidence does not support a responsible call. Null unweighted likely-voter sample counts can mean the pollster did not disclose a separate count; this is explained in the record.

Forecast inputs can share polls and correlated errors. DDHQ’s race methodology describes a blend of fundamentals, polls and markets; it is not a polling-only model. Poliwave acknowledges that its model has not been historically calibrated. DDHQ-METHOD · POL

Election night needs separate awaiting-polls, counting, projected, certified and corrected states. A forecast never automatically becomes a race call. Keep immutable dated snapshots and a visible correction log.

This edition was compiled with automated research assistance and source cross-checks. Automated checks do not represent a named human reviewer’s signoff. Original historical calendar records retain their earlier provenance.

Dates describe different things

Source publication, poll fieldwork, actual research check, dataset revision and browser render time remain distinct. A rebuild does not renew an old source check. Historical election records retain their original retrieval dates.

Confidence and review

Current guides use source cross-checks and explicit method rules. Original calendar records marked “Confirmed official” describe their source classification. This refresh does not invent a human approval or extend historical verification to newly added claims.